Delhi High Court Refuses to Recuse Judge from Kejriwal Liquor Policy Case

Delhi High Court Judge Swarana Kanta Sharma has refused to recuse herself from the liquor policy case involving Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, allowing the proceedings to continue as scheduled. The judge emphasized her impartiality, stating that mere suspicion of bias or apprehension of not receiving relief does not justify recusal, according to the Times of India.

Justice Sharma highlighted previous instances where relief was granted to Kejriwal and his associates without hearing the opposing party, as reported by NDTV, reinforcing her stance that her past rulings should not be seen as grounds for disqualification. This assertion came after members of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) sought her withdrawal from the case.

The refusal sparked political reactions, with a BJP Member of Parliament criticizing Kejriwal over the recusal plea, describing the AAP chief as a "bully," according to Hindustan Times. The judge’s detailed ruling, which lasted over an hour, reiterated legal standards for recusal and stressed the importance of preserving judicial independence amid pressures.

The liquor excise policy case remains active despite a trial court discharging Kejriwal, his deputy Manish Sisodia, and 21 others on February 27, as noted by Hindustan Times. The High Court’s decision ensures that the legal scrutiny of the policy and related allegations will proceed without delay.

Observers will be watching the Delhi High Court closely for forthcoming hearings and decisions, as the case could have significant implications for governance and regulatory policies in the capital. The ruling also sets a precedent on judicial conduct and standards for recusal in politically sensitive matters.